DDC Blog

What's Happening at Discovery Diving

Get all the latest info from our Instructors and Staff on our SCUBA Classes, Charters, Equipment and Special Events.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

 

 

A Florida family who spends their time together hunting for treasure struck it rich over the weekend, hauling up an estimated $300,000 worth of gold from an historic wreckage in the Atlantic Ocean.


"What's really neat about them is they are a family, they spend family time together out there and the most amazing part about them is they always believed this day would come," said Brent Brisben, whose company 1715 Fleet - Queens Jewels LLC owns the rights to the wreckage.


Brisben said Rick and Lisa Schmitt, and their grown children Hillary and Eric, found gold chains and coins from the wreckage of a convoy of 11 ships that went down in a hurricane off the coast of Florida in 1715 en route from Havana to Spain.


The ships' manifests indicate that about $400 million worth of treasure was on board, of which $175 million has been recovered, Brisben said.


His company bought the rights to the wreck site from the heirs of legendary treasure hunter Mel Fisher in 2010 and allows others, including the Schmitts, to search under subcontracting agreements.


Brisben said the Schmitts, who live in Sanford, Florida, have been searching for treasure for years. Eric Schmitt, who made the latest haul, also found a silver platter worth about $25,000 in 2002 when he was a high school sophomore.


Under U.S. and Florida law, the treasure will be placed into the custody of the U.S. District Court in South Florida. The state of Florida will be allowed to take possession of up to 20 percent of the find for display in a state museum. The remainder will be split evenly between Brisben's company and the Schmitt family, he said.


Brisben said the story of the 1715 wreckage was used as a basis for the 1977 film "The Deep" and for the 2008 film "Fool's Gold".


By Barbara Liston; Reporting by Jane Sutton; Editing by Leslie Gevirtz (C) Reuters 2013.

Hits: 1928
0

 

 

Scientists have shown for the first time that deep-sea fishes that use bioluminescence for communication are diversifying into different species faster than other glowing fishes that use light for camouflage. The new research indicates that bioluminescence -- a phenomenon in which animals generate visible light through a chemical reaction -- could promote communication and mating in the open ocean, an environment with few barriers to reproduction. The study was recently published in the journal Marine Biology

"Bioluminescence is quite common in the deep sea, and many fishes inhabiting this region exhibit complex, species-specific patterns of light-producing structures," said John Sparks, a curator in the American Museum of Natural History's Department of Ichthyology and one of the co-authors on the study. "But we still have so much to learn about how these animals use bioluminescence -- for predation, camouflage, communication, or something else. This new work provides insight into how this phenomenon might have shaped present-day biodiversity in the deep open ocean."

Unlike on land, where rivers, mountain ranges, and other physical obstacles can genetically isolate animals from one another resulting in speciation events over time, in the deep open ocean there are few obvious physical barriers to reproduction and gene flow. This has traditionally been considered one of the reasons why there is a comparatively low level of fish species richness in the deep sea. For example, bristlemouths, which are among the most abundant vertebrates on Earth, are represented by only 21 species. But that's not the case for all fishes. Lanternfishes, which inhabit the same mid-water, or mesopelagic, area of the ocean, have diversified into more than 250 species.

"The comparison of lanternfishes and bristlemouths is ideal for studying speciation in the deep sea. Both bioluminescent groups are among the most abundant vertebrates on Earth and live in the same dark environment," said Matthew Davis, a research associate at the University of Kansas and the study's lead author. "The difference in species numbers between these two groups is striking. Both use bioluminescence for camouflage, but lanternfishes have evolved a suite of light organs that act as a beacon for communication, which our work suggests have had an incredible impact on their diversification in the deep sea."

To investigate, Sparks, Davis, and other scientists from the University of Kansas and Johnson County Community College reconstructed a tree of life for ray-finned fishes with a particular focus on the evolution of bioluminescence.

Many fishes emit light from organs called photophores that appear as luminous spots on the body. On lanternfishes, photophores are present ventrally along the belly, laterally on the flank and head, and on the tail. The researchers discovered that the common ancestor of lanternfishes most likely evolved this complex photophore system during the Late Cretaceous, between 73-104 million years ago.

The significance of the photophores on the underside of mesopelagic fishes has long been thought to provide camouflage against predators swimming below, helping them to blend in with any residual light shining down from the surface. But the function of photophores on the side of the body has been obscure, until now. Using mathematical techniques based on the anatomy of the fishes, the researchers determined that the lateral photophore patterns on certain lanternfish lineages are distinct enough to allow identification of individual species. This is not the case for photophores on the belly. Recent work has shown that lanternfishes are capable of seeing blue-green bioluminescence from up to about 100 feet away, supporting the idea that lateral photophores could be used for interspecific communication.

"In this study we have shown that deep-sea fishes that exhibit unique, species-specific bioluminescent organs, like lanternfishes and dragonfishes, also exhibit increased rates of diversification," said Leo Smith, an assistant curator of ichthyology at the University of Kansas and a co-author on the paper. "This suggests to us that bioluminescent signaling may be critical to diversification of fishes in the deep sea."

To further test this hypothesis, the researchers plan to record lanternfish flashing patterns using emerging technology, such as remotely operated vehicles outfitted with ultra low-light underwater cameras. Other tools that might assist in this type of research include the Exosuit, a next-generation, human-piloted atmospheric diving system now on display in the American Museum of Natural History's Irma and Paul Milstein Family Hall of Ocean Life through March 5, 2014.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by American Museum of Natural History. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

Hits: 1976
0

 

 

For the first time, researchers at the University of Hawaii and the University of Tokyo outfitted sharks with sophisticated sensors and video recorders to measure and see where they are going, how they are getting there, and what they are doing once they reach their destinations.

Scientists are also piloting a project using instruments ingested by sharks and other top ocean predators, like tuna, to gain new awareness into these animals' feeding habits. The instruments, which use electrical measurements to track ingestion and digestion of prey, can help researchers understand where, when and how much sharks and other predators are eating, and what they are feasting on.

The instruments are providing scientists with a "shark's eye" view of the ocean and greater understanding than ever before of the lives of these fish in their natural environment.

"What we are doing is really trying to fill out the detail of what their role is in the ocean," said Carl Meyer, an assistant researcher at the Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. "It is all about getting a much deeper understanding of sharks' ecological role in the ocean, which is important to the health of the ocean and, by extension, to our own well-being."

Using the sensors and video recorders, the researchers captured unprecedented images of sharks of different species swimming in schools, interacting with other fish and moving in repetitive loops across the sea bed. They also found that sharks used powered swimming more often than a gliding motion to move through the ocean, contrary to what scientists had previously thought, and that deep-sea sharks swim in slow motion compared to shallow water species.

"These instrument packages are like flight data recorders for sharks," Meyer said. "They allow us to quantify a variety of different things that we haven't been able to quantify before."

"It has really drawn back the veil on what these animals do and answered some longstanding questions," he added.

Meyer and Kim Holland, a researcher also at the Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, are presenting the new research today at the 2014 Ocean Sciences Meeting co-sponsored by the Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography, The Oceanography Society and the American Geophysical Union.

Sharks are at the top of the ocean food chain, Meyer noted, making them an important part of the marine ecosystem, and knowing more about these fish helps scientists better understand the flow of energy through the ocean. Until now, sharks have mainly been observed in captivity, and have been tracked only to see where they traveled.

These new observations could help shape conservation and resource management efforts, and inform public safety measures, Holland said. The instruments being used by scientists to study feeding habits could also have commercial uses, including for aquaculture, he added.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by American Geophysical Union.

Hits: 1955
0

 

Small satellite-tracking devices attached to sea turtles swimming off Florida's coast have

delivered first-of-its-kind data that could help unlock they mystery of what endangered

turtles do during the "lost years."

The "lost years" refers to the time after turtles hatch and head to sea where they remain for many years before returning to near-shore waters as large juveniles. The time period is often referred to as the "lost years" because not much has been known about where the young turtles go and how they interact with their oceanic environment -- until now.

"What is exciting is that we provide the first look at the early behavior and movements of young sea turtles in the wild," said UCF biologist Kate Mansfield, who led the team. "Before this study, most of the scientific information about the early life history of sea turtles was inferred through genetics studies, opportunistic sightings offshore, or laboratory-based studies. With real observations of turtles in their natural environment, we are able to examine and reevaluate existing hypotheses about the turtles' early life history. This knowledge may help managers provide better protection for these threatened and endangered species."

Findings from the study appear today in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

A team of scientists from the UCF, Florida Atlantic University, University of Miami (UM) Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, and University of Wisconsin, tracked 17 loggerhead turtles for 27 to 220 days in the open ocean using small, solar-powered satellite tags. The goal was to better understand the turtles' movements, habitat preferences, and what role temperature may play in early sea turtle life history.

Some of the findings challenge previously held beliefs.

While the turtles remain in oceanic waters (traveling between 124 miles to 2,672 miles) off the continental shelf and the loggerhead turtles sought the surface of the water as predicted, the study found that the turtles do not necessarily remain within the currents associated with the North Atlantic subtropical gyre. It was historically thought that loggerhead turtles hatching from Florida's east coast complete a long, developmental migration in a large circle around the Atlantic entrained in these currents. But the team's data suggest that turtles may drop out of these currents into the middle of the Atlantic or the Sargasso Sea.

The team also found that while the turtles mostly stayed at the sea surface, where they were exposed to the sun's energy, the turtles' shells registered more heat than anticipated (as recorded by sensors in the satellite tags), leading the team to consider a new hypothesis about why the turtles seek refuge in Sargassum. It is a type of seaweed found on the surface of the water in the deep ocean long associated with young sea turtles.

"We propose that young turtles remain at the sea surface to gain a thermal benefit," Mansfield said. "This makes sense because the turtles are cold blooded animals. By remaining at the sea surface, and by associating with Sargassum habitat, turtles gain a thermal refuge of sorts that may help enhance growth and feeding rates, among other physiological benefits."

More research will be needed, but it's a start at cracking the "lost years" mystery.

The findings are important because the loggerhead turtles along with other sea turtles are threatened or endangered species. Florida beaches are important to their survival because they provide important nesting grounds in North America. More than 80% of Atlantic loggerheads nest along Florida's coast. There are other important nesting grounds and nursing areas for sea turtles in the western hemisphere found from as far north as Virginia to South America and the Caribbean.

"From the time they leave our shores, we don't hear anything about them until they surface near the Canary Islands, which is like their primary school years," said Florida Atlantic University professor Jeannette Wyneken, the study's co- PI and author. "There's a whole lot that happens during the Atlantic crossing that we knew nothing about. Our work helps to redefine Atlantic loggerhead nursery grounds and early loggerhead habitat use."

Mansfield joined UCF in 2013. She has a Ph.D. from the Virginia Institute of Marine Science and a master's degree from the Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science at the University of Miami. She previously worked at Florida International University, through the Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies (CIMAS) in association with the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Marine Fisheries Services. She was a National Academies NRC postdoctoral associate based at NOAA's Southeast Fisheries Science Center, and remains an affiliate faculty in Florida Atlantic University's biology department where Wyneken is based.

With colleagues at each institution Mansfield conducted research that has helped further the understanding of the sea turtle "lost years" and sea turtle life history as a whole. For example she and Wyneken developed a satellite tagging method using a non-toxic manicure acrylic, old wetsuits, and hair-extension glue to attach satellite tags to small turtles. Tagging small turtles is very difficult by traditional means because of their small size and how fast they grow.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by University of Central Florida.

Hits: 2126
0

Posted by on in Wrecks

   

Source: World Lionfish Hunters Association http://lionfish.co/

 

The following questions are the most frequently asked about the non-native, invasive lionfish. We have additional links to a comprehensive list of lionfish facts, most common lionfish myths as well as a 7 interesting (and shocking) facts you might not know about this very serious issue facing our underwater ecosystems  in the Western Atlantic Basin.

If you find these facts useful in your research about lionfish and other invasive species, please consider providing a back link to Lionfish.co, giving us a Google+1, a Facebook “like” or a mention on Twitter so that we can continue with our mission and effectively reach others like yourself in a meaningful and educated way.

Thank you!

Why are lionfish so bad? Are lionfish a problem?

We’ve written an extensive article on why lionfish are a serious problem but provide the following summary: Lionfish pose a significant danger to the entire ocean eco-systems they invade economically, environmentally, and ecologically. In their non-native habitats lionfish have no predators having any effect on their exploding population. They are highly resistant to disease and infection. Females can lay up to 2 million eggs per year that largely escape predation due to a repellant occurring in the fertilized egg mass. This means that huge percentages of lionfish fry will recruit to the safety of structure and mature with little predatory stress.

Lionfish Eat Everything - Stomach ContentsLionfish are voracious predators! They will eat almost any marine creature it can fit into its mouth, up to 2/3 of its own body size and include fish that are commercially important- juvenile snapper, grouper, flounder and other common “table fish;” recreationally important – juvenile billfish, mahi mahi, wahoo, jacks, tuna and other prized “game fish” for anglers as well as the creatures divers enjoy seeing like octopus, sea horses, lobsters, crabs, etc; and ecologically important – the cleaner fish and shrimp that keep bigger fish healthy by removing parasites and other disease causing organisms and the grazing creatures that keep the reef free of algae and other growth that would otherwise smother the reef to death.

They are gluttonous feeders, meaning that they will eat as much as they can physically manage as often as they are able; lionfish stomachs can expand up to 30 times their normal volume. Native marine creatures and fish stock do not instinctively recognize lionfish as predators and are easily hunted. Science has demonstrated that a single lionfish can reduce marine creatures by 80% to 90% in its range within 5 weeks. When food is scarce, a lionfish’s metabolism can essentially crawl to a stop; Lad Akins, Director of Special Projects at REEF, said in one presentation not long ago that studies have shown that lionfish can live without food for up to 3 months and only lose 10% of their body mass.

Here’s the bottom line:

Invasive lionfish are disastrously out-breeding, out-living, out-eating and out-competing every other native fish in the Western Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. If left unchecked lionfish will ultimately cause the destruction of the reefs, native fish stocks and the livelihoods of everyone that depend upon them.

Where are lionfish originally from? Where do lionfish come from?

The lionfish invasion consists almost entirely of two species of lionfish, Pterois volitans (red lionfish) and Pterois miles (common lionfish or devil firefish). Virtually indistinguishable from each other outside of the laboratory, P. volitans is thought to make up approximately 93% of the total invasive population. Both the red lionfish and common lionfish come from the oceans of the Indian & South Pacific Oceans (Indo-Pacific) and the Red Sea as depicted in this map of their native range and habit:


How long have lionfish been considered a problem or threat? When did lionfish get here in the Western Hemisphere?

The first documented sighting of lionfish in the United States occurred in October of 1985 when a crab trap fisherman, Richard Nielsen, fishing off of Dania, Florida, brought up a red lionfish in a crab trap. While this is the first confirmed sighting, there are unconfirmed stories of very rare lionfish sightings along the east coast of the United States by fishermen and scuba divers from as early as the ’70s. It’s safe to assume that non-native lionfish were a threat to the local environment the very day they were introduced.

Click on the video below to watch the lionfish population explosion as it occurred between 1985 and 2013, pay particular attention to the progression through the years beginning with 2007.

 

This video is based upon visual sighting data reported to REEF, NOAA and the USGS; considering that lionfish can live to depths of at least 1000 feet or 305 meters, the actual lionfish population is probably much worse.

How did lionfish get to the Western Atlantic Ocean, into the Gulf of Mexico and spread throughout the Caribbean?

How lionfish were first introduced into the Western Hemisphere is a topic of much debate and consternation. One theory is that several lionfish somehow escaped and were swept into the sea when a private aquarium in Florida was destroyed during Hurricane Andrew in 1992. This is likely NOT the cause for the lionfish invasion because confirmed lionfish sightings date back to 1985.

Another theory is that lionfish, or more probably lionfish egg masses, were transported into the Western Atlantic Basin in ship’s ballast tanks. This theory, as it relates to lionfish, cannot necessarily be disproven and there is plenty of proof that non-native marine species have been spread through the ballast tanks of commercial ocean going vessels. Ultimately, a severe lack of genetic diversity in the invasive population tends to lead scientists in other directions looking for the source and cause.

Today, most scientists agree that the lionfish invasion was started by lionfish removed from home aquariums and disposed of into the Atlantic ocean around Southeast Florida.

Lionfish egg masses and larvae were then distributed across the Western Atlantic Basin via ocean currents. Lionfish are now found as far north as Rhode Island and as far south as Brazil. Wintertime ocean temperatures seem to be the only limiting factor of their distribution as it is believed that lionfish are unable to survive water temperatures below approximately 50 degrees Fahrenheit or 10 degrees Celsius

Do lionfish have natural predators in the Indo-Pacific Oceans and Red Sea?

Natural predators in the Indo-Pacific and Red Sea that are known to eat lionfish include sharks, cornetfish, grouper, large eels, frogfish and other scorpionfish. There is speculation that large snapper and some species of trigger fish eat lionfish in their native ranges as well.

What is being done to control lionfish? What can be done about lionfish? Can we train other native fish to eat lionfish?

It doesn’t appear likely that we can train native fish to hunt and eat healthy lionfish. It has been tried with sharks and groupers. There are several problems associated with this approach; first, in one experiment in which researchers placed a small lionfish in a tank of several hungry grouper, the much larger predators actually cowered away from the aggressive lionfish and avoided it almost to the point of starving to death before the researchers intervened. Secondly, fish do not train their offspring to hunt like a mammal does. There is really know “transfer of knowledge” and every new generation of predator would have to be trained. Thirdly, ad hoc training by inexperienced handlers only produces a perilous situation in which the “trainers” (mostly well-meaning divemasters and instructors) teach large and potentially dangerous predators to equate lionfish hunters with food. In turn, these animals have become quite aggressive in locations across the affected area and have caused serious injuries to other divers and numerous close-calls. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to be chased by sharks, eels and barracuda every time I go lionfish hunting. Lastly, stories of grouper eating healthy lionfish are becoming more frequent but a study very recently published indicated that the *number* of predators, i.e. grouper, are so low that they are having very little, if any, effect on the invasive lionfish population.

Absent any naturally occurring predator or environmental solution to control the exploding lionfish population and slow the lionfish invasion, it would seem that humans must actively target and kill lionfish through hunting, fishing and trapping.

Hunting with a speargun, pole spear, Hawaiian sling or other pointy object is the most effective. Lionfish are rarely caught on a hook & line or fishing pole but it does happen on accident. Experiments are underway to use special fish traps and larval traps, but the concern of unintended by-catch is always a concern.

Visit our lionfish hunting page for more information about tools, techniques and other considerations while lionfish hunting.

Are lionfish dangerous to humans? Do lionfish attack people?

Lionfish are not aggressive towards humans and we’ve never documented a story in which a lionfish has offensively attacked anyone. Lionfish have most certainly caused injuries to people out of self defense or by accident. Most often divers are stung by lionfish while hunting and a thrashing lionfish either gets off of the spear tip and blindly swims into the hunter while it’s trying to escape. Divers are also prone to being envenomated while trying to put a lionfish into a bag or storage device. Likewise, divers also get hurt when they are too close to a lionfish hunter at work and especially the lionfish at the end of his or her spear.

Divers and underwater photographers have been hurt because they either didn’t see a lionfish or got entirely too close to what they THOUGHT was a docile fish; with a lighting fast shake the lionfish has managed to get a spine or two into the diver and the pain sets in very quickly. If you mind your buoyancy, are aware of your surroundings and NEVER touch or molest marine creatures you will entirely avoid a very painful lesson.

While rare, unsuspecting swimmers and bathers in shallow water have been known to accidentally kick or step on a lionfish causing themselves injury.

People also tend to get stung by a lionfish when handling them after a hunt or while cleaning lionfish prior to eating them. It’s easy to get careless when handling what you think is a dead fish that surprises you with a final violent “death shake,” too. Our advice is to treat a lionfish like a gun: its ALWAYS loaded until the spines are removed and disposed of safely.

Are lionfish poisonous or venomous?

Lionfish are venomous, not poisonous. Venom must be injected into the body through bites, spines, fangs and stingers while poison must be inhaled or ingested (eaten, swallowed or absorbed) in order for the toxin to have any effect. Lionfish have needle-sharp spines that are capable of delivering a potent protein-based neuromuscular toxin.

Where are the venomous spines? How many dangerous spines does a lionfish have?

Invasive lionfish (P. volitans & P. miles) usually have 18 venomous spines in all – 13 long spines in the dorsal fin, 1 short spine in each of its pelvic fins and 3 short spines in the leading edge of the anal fin.


The pectoral fins, the fins that lionfish most often fan out to their sides, and the caudal fin (the tail) do not contain any venomous spines.

What will happen to me if I get stung by a lionfish?

Symptoms of being envenomated by a lionfish include the almost immediate onset of INTENSE pain followed by swelling, redness and bruising in the area of the of the puncture wound. Secondary symptoms associated with a lionfish sting can include shortness of breath, allergic reactions ranging from minor symptoms through very serious anaphylaxis, dizziness, nauseousness, fainting and, in isolated cases, temporary paralysis. Severe pain may last for several hours and slowly decrease over the course of 24 hours and may take days to completely subside.

It should be noted the severity and duration of symptoms can be directly correlated to the amount of venom delivered, how deep the spine(s) punctured the body and the “freshness” of the venom as well as the victims own constitution or sensitivity to the venom; the protein chains in the venom begin to breakdown after the lionfish dies and is exposed to air, heat or freezing temperatures.

Can I die from being stung by a lionfish?

For a reasonably healthy adult the chances of dying are very, very low… but you might be in so much pain that you want to. There have been no known fatalities caused by a lionfish sting, though the possibility does exist as a result of the effects of shock from the intensity of the pain or complications caused by an infection if left untreated.

How do I treat a lionfish sting? What is the proper first aid for lionfish stings?

Obviously, if you are scuba diving or freediving you must safely end your dive as soon as possible and get to a safe and stable place where you can call for emergency medical services if required.

First aid and treatment of a lionfish sting includes inspecting the puncture wound and removing any pieces of the spines that may have broken off and remain in the injection site. Control bleeding and immediately apply the hottest water you can stand without scalding or burning your skin. Immersing the affected area is best but if it is not possible due to circumstances or the wound’s location, applying a clean cloth soaked in hot water is most effective. Using hot packs or a hair dryer may provide some much needed relief as well. Do not cause further damage by burning yourself.

Lionfish Sting Provided by Aruba Under Water Hunters (AUWH)Despite the amount of swelling, DO NOT APPLY ICE or cold compresses until the pain has completely subsided – this will only make the pain worse and prolong the amount of time you will suffer! Common home remedies like urine, vinegar, baking soda, etc. are rarely effective against protein-based neurotoxins; they are not recommended and should be avoided.

If desired, taking over-the-counter pain medications such as aspirin or tylenol can help manage the pain if you can tolerate them.

Clean the wound thoroughly as recommended for any injury caused by a marine animal or organism in order to prevent infection.

Seek medical attention immediately if you suspect anaphylactic shock (extreme allergic reaction), shortness of breath or trouble breathing, decompression illness, fainting or if the pain becomes unbearable. Additionally, if the wound appears infected or the skin surrounding the injection site appears to be blackening, putrefying or being eaten away (necrosis or tissue death).

Quite frankly, seeking medical attention is NEVER a bad idea in the event of a lionfish sting and the WLHA highly recommends it.

Can you eat lionfish? How is lionfish cooked or prepared?

Absolutely! Lionfish is delicious and can be prepared in so many ways! Ceviche, sushi, sashimi (raw), fried, baked, in soup… Lionfish is a very mild white meat with no “red line” that can be prepared just about any way snapper, mahi mahi (dolphin fish or dorado) and grouper can be prepared.

For more information see our article describing what lionfish tastes like, our lionfish cleaning and preparation page  as well as our lionfish recipes page.

Is eating lionfish dangerous? Are lionfish poisonous like puffer or fugu dishes?

Lionfish Ceviche from La Perlita in Cozumel, MexicoThe common myth that eating lionfish is somehow deadly is very wrong. Lionfish are not poisonous to eat and there is absolutely no risk of keeling over and dying from a lionfish not being prepared or cooked correctly! Even ingesting lionfish venom would not present any health risks because the venom would be denatured almost immediately when it came in contact with stomach acid (though we personally would be concerned about having fresh venom come into contact with any open sores or cuts inside of the mouth or gums… yikes!).

Lionfish are extremely safe to eat in most areas, however, just like eating snapper, grouper, barracuda and over 400 other species of fish identified as potential carriers caution must be exercised in those limited areas where ciguatera fish poisoning (CFP) is a problem. Local fishermen, divers and restaurants will often be aware if ciguatoxins cause local seafood concerns.

Do you have a question about lionfish that you would like answered? This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.!

About the Author:

Scott Harrell is the Executive Director of the World Lionfish Hunters Association. He was a high profile private investigator and business consultant who now lives and "slow travels" throughout the Caribbean and Latin America hunting lionfish and working with dive centers on behalf of the WLHA. Scott has been a dive instructor since 1995. He can be reached via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..
Hits: 4837
0

U/W Bike Race

eventsiconJoin us on July 4th for this annual event benefitting the Children's Mile of Hope.

Lionfish Roundup

eventsiconAn exciting partnership between Discovery Diving, NOAA, and Carteret Community College.

Treasure Hunt

eventsiconFood, prizes, diving, and fun! Proceeds benefit the Mile Hope Children's Cancer Fund and DAN's research in diving safety.

ECARA Event

2013Join us March 7, 2015 at the Bryant Student Center, Carteret Community College, Morehead City in support of the East Carolina Artificial Reef Association.  Click here for more info on this great event and how you can help to bring more Wrecks to the Graveyard of the Atlantic.